Group

Class

Name

Why he/she was awarded

Group 1

METT-V1

Ricky Park

Ricky’s answer was very well-developed; he gave multiple reasons and explained them. He used good vocabulary and his grammar was pretty good. He worked very hard to practice for the contest, too.

Group 2

METT-S

Daniel Choi

Daniel’s answer was written as one, cohesive narrative and he used some very good vocabulary. His grammar was among the best of Group 2 and his ideas were both extremely creative and quite logical.

Group 3

ACE-E

Dana Cheon

Dana’s response was incredibly creative and included suprisingly mature, perceptive ideas. Her grammar could use some work, but she used very good vocabulary and poetic language and she even included a metaphor to illustrate one of her points, which we found very impressive.